E3 - Empower, Enhance, Explore
- Empowering Chapters
- Enhancing Technology
- Exploring Opportunities
Empowering Recruitment: Expanding the support to our Chapters is a top priority. As former Chapter COs, we are both aware of how much STARFLEET needs strong, vibrant Chapters. An improved, accessible recruitment toolkit is at the top of our list. The current administration has laid the groundwork, but I believe there’s an opportunity to grow these resources exponentially—creating modern, accessible, and eye-catching tools for members to use in their communities.
Enhancing Technology: The Membership Database isn’t where it needs to be, and I intend to make it a primary focus in my first year. I’ve been vocal about this issue at the ECAB level, and I’m determined to see decisions finalized and progress made.
Exploring Licensing Opportunities: While it’s a bold and potentially controversial goal, I believe we need to engage with the rights holders of Star Trek. Gaining official licensing could clarify our position and expand opportunities for the organization. It won’t be easy, but I believe the long-term benefits are worth the effort.
Supporting our regional leaders and chapters requires providing them with practical tools and resources while reinforcing STARFLEET’s core mission.
Recruitment and Growth: Our organization’s longevity depends on sustained growth. I will prioritize equipping leaders with easy-to-use, visually engaging recruitment tools that highlight STARFLEET’s unique opportunities. Expanding upon our branding efforts will also strengthen the visibility and appeal of our chapters.
Community Impact: STARFLEET is at its best when we are doing good in our communities. By amplifying the outreach efforts of our chapters and empowering them to showcase their philanthropic initiatives, we can enhance both STARFLEET’s reputation and our members' pride in their contributions.
While rebuilding relationships with external organizations and the broader Star Trek community has been challenging, progress is possible with persistence and a collaborative approach. My plan is threefold:
Engagement at Events: Continuing to work alongside other organizations at events, emphasizing a spirit of cooperation over competition.
Collaboration, Not Antagonism: Ensuring STARFLEET maintains professionalism in all interactions. By being transparent and collaborative, we can rebuild trust and open new doors for partnerships.
Amplifying Success Stories: Highlighting the impact STARFLEET chapters have on their communities and showcasing the benefits of collaborating with us.
Though progress may be slow, every step toward stronger relationships will build a better future for STARFLEET and the broader Star Trek community.
The most significant challenge we face today is recognition. Too few people know who we are and what we do. While the recent rebranding efforts have been a step in the right direction, there’s still much work to be done.
To address this, I will focus on:
- Expanding our recruitment and outreach efforts with modern, visually engaging tools. - Enhancing our online presence and social media strategies to reach a wider audience. - Encouraging chapters to showcase their community impact through local events and media coverage.
By improving how we present ourselves to the world, we can build STARFLEET’s reputation and attract new members.
As asked by Amanda (Region 12) via our campaign FaceBook group
Thanks so much for the question, Amanda. When it comes to technology, we see it as one of the most important tools STARFLEET can better leverage, not only to strengthen internal operations, but also to empower our membership at every level.
The most urgent priority is, without question, the Membership Database. I have been one of the most vocal advocates for its modernization. I've been helping lead the Database Review Committee, meeting with external companies, and coordinating stakeholder input to better understand both our current needs and the limitations of the system we’ve inherited. While we’ve explored outside options, what I’ve discovered is that we need to build something more tailored to our unique structure and that’s going to take directed ongoing vision with a stable set of hands to keep the project moving in the same direction.
I'm not scared to say that that has been one of the primary issues with the Database between each administration over the last decade. If elected, this will be a primary focus. But our vision for STARFLEET’s technological future goes beyond the Database. We want to offer our chapters and departments new tools to help them thrive. That means things like simplified, shared file systems, templates for chapter branding and reports (beyond just what the CoE offers), and integrated platforms for communication and scheduling.
As VCS, I began transitioning portions of the Executive Committee and its support teams onto the Google Workspace platform. This is something no previous administration has attempted at scale - and something I'd like to expand. I also started efforts to use that system to catalog organizational history and secure our institutional memory for future leaders. That type of forward thinking is exactly what we want to bring to the entire membership. And, of course, technology should make it easier for members to connect and participate - whether that’s via the CQ, livestreamed events, digital awards tracking, or real-time communications platforms like Discord (which we’ve embraced in this very campaign).
We believe the future of STARFLEET is making sure everyone - from the longest-serving Admiral to a brand-new member - has the tools they need to be engaged and successful. Of course, we know we haven’t thought of everything - so we’re committed to remaining open to new ideas from the membership about how technology can be used to better support STARFLEET and its members.
As asked by Jess (Region 20) vio the Region 20 SFI Election Discord
Hi Jess, Thanks for your question. You are quite right in pointing out that we are all volunteers, but an organisation like ours can only work if those taking on roles are able to perform that role effectively, which absolutely includes being able to respond to questions within a sensible timeframe.
I won’t make empty promises about making anyone in a role answer emails/enquiries because it would be just that, an empty promise. What we will do is to be clear - when people apply for a role - being effective in that role requires having the time to answer enquiries as they arise.
What we can do is to make sure that when issues about non-responses are brought up that we follow up to see if there are any real-life issues that have arisen and to work with that position-holder and any staff in the same area to get the outstanding questions answered. Ultimately that may mean we tell someone that the role they are undertaking needs someone with more flexibility and so we’ll ask them to stand down - moving from asking to telling if that should become necessary.
On the flip side, if we’re not aware of issues then it becomes really hard to address them, so I’d urge people to flag issues when a sensible amount of time has passed (and for reference, I’d say 96 hours / 4 days for an initial response) ‘up the chain’. In this instance about an Auxiliary question - the natural chain would have been to ask the Department Director/Vice-Director and after not hearing to have gone to the DAS (which is Ryan in this instance) and again if you hear nothing, then speak to your RC.
By making your RC aware of any issues, they can ask us and then we can start to make enquiries - which is likely what would have happened if it had gotten that far - winding up on the CS’s desk.
We intend to continue to be transparent to the Admiralty Board, so if we become aware a member of staff is out of the loop, we’ll pass that on.
In short, we can’t make people answer questions, but if they constantly don’t answer, then we’ll look at finding someone who has the capacity to do so.
As asked by Mark (Region 2) via our campaign Discord
Hey Mark, thanks for the question.
Honestly, I don’t have any plans to change the current Auxiliary structure. Serving as the Director of Auxiliary Services has been an eye-opening experience, and it’s given me a real appreciation for the value the role brings to each of our Auxiliary groups. My intention isn’t to permanently tie it to the VCS position. I’d love to return it to a standalone role if we can find the right volunteer to take it on (any takers? :picardwink: ). In the meantime, I’ve genuinely enjoyed the opportunity to work directly with you and Anthony in this capacity.
I’ll also be candid: if I weren’t elected and found myself with more time and fewer organizational responsibilities, I can absolutely see myself pouring my energy back into the Auxiliaries. They’ve been a huge part of what has kept STARFLEET fun and fulfilling for me, and I’m incredibly proud of what we’ve accomplished so far.
As asked by Matt (Region 12) via our campaign Discord
Hi Matt, thanks for your question. Thanks also to Jayden & Mark for the further expansion and explanation they’ve given.
Ryan gave a really good overview of the issues with the current database and what we will commit to do if elected to replace it with a new system. As part of that work, we will absolutely be engaging with all the relevant users (stakeholders) from Chapter CO’s through to Fleet Ops staff and all stops in between which will definitely include our auxiliaries!
Part of that engagement will be asking stakeholders to give us their wish lists. My view at the moment is that these would come under one of the following three categories:
- Must have
- Makes life easier but can do without
- If money was no object we’d like...
Obviously when we get into the nuts and bolts of it all, this may change, but what we are committed to is getting a system that works for SFI now and in the future.
As asked by Jess (Region 20) via our campaign Discord
Thanks for another question, Jess. It’s a thoughtful one, and something we’ve both spent a great deal of time considering as we formed our platform.
Below is a list of the items we strongly believe are SFI’s biggest issues over the coming next few years. But speaking personally, I believe one of the biggest challenges STARFLEET faces moving forward is resistance to change. It’s natural in a long-standing organization like ours, especially one built on pure passion and volunteerism, for people to become attached to “how things have always been done.” Change, even when it’s for the better, can feel like disruption. That being said, one of our major goals is to introduce improvements and policy with transparency, clarity, and a clear purpose. To bring members along for the journey, not just announce a destination.
As I mentioned, here are the other natural challenges we discussed as we began preparing to run:
Aging infrastructure: Our current membership database and other tools are functional, but they are outdated and require major overhauls if we want to scale or modernize.
Volunteer fatigue: Many leaders in SFI wear multiple hats. Burnout is a real concern, and we need to build systems that support sustainable engagement and leadership transitions. I don’t want to name any names but some critical, load-bearing roles are staffed by some individuals that are struggling in their personal lives - and it’s time for this next group of volunteers to step up.
Membership growth and retention: We have to actively work to attract new members, especially younger fans of Star Trek, while keeping long-time members feeling seen, heard, and valued. It’s almost certainly going to be done alongside new fandom with the new Trek that we’ve been so mercifully supplied on Paramount+, we just now have to choose to use it.
Communication consistency: We still struggle as an organization with ensuring consistent, accessible communication across platforms, regions, and leadership levels. One of your questions from just the other day drives at that issue - and it’s something that David and I were working on as part of the current administration, but Richard and I plan to take a more active hand in.
None of these are insurmountable, but they will require deliberate, focused leadership and a strong partnership between the Executive Committee, the Admiralty Board, and our members. We’re ready for the work - it’s work we’ve already started in our current roles, and plan to expand.
As asked by Stephen (Region 1) via our Campaign Discord
Thanks for the question. Point well made, I want to ask folks to please remember to keep things civil and constructive, even when we’re discussing complicated or emotional issues like this one.
To your point: I absolutely understand the frustration you’re expressing. Many of us joined STARFLEET because of our love of Star Trek, and it can feel disheartening when we’re asked to downplay that identity in our public-facing materials. But I want to be clear - this shift hasn’t been about “hiding” or “giving in.” It’s about respecting copyright and trademark law, and doing the work to position STARFLEET in a way that could actually open doors for us in the future.
That’s why Richard and I made “Exploring Licensing Opportunities” one of the pillars of our campaign. We believe STARFLEET should stop avoiding the conversation and start engaging with CBS/Paramount in a respectful, proactive way. We want to come to the table, not with demands, but with an open hand, a strong membership base, and a clear record of not infringing on their intellectual property. That’s how you build credibility and open the door to a possible working relationship, not close it further.
But here’s the tough truth: we can’t ask for that relationship while continuing to use things we know are copyrighted. And I’ll be direct to your question: the USS Mountaineer’s logo, which uses the ship image from a Star Trek: Discovery novel cover, is one of several examples that has put us at risk - and one specifically denoted when Paramount reached out to us last year. These kinds of choices don’t make us look like bold defenders of fandom - they make us look careless with someone else’s creative property. That doesn’t help the cause.
So yes, I do want to fight for this organization. But I want to do it smartly. Not by throwing punches in public or picking fights we can’t win, but by creating a record of trust, professionalism, and respectful engagement that makes it possible for us to be heard when the time comes.
That’s how we move Forward, Together.
Thanks again for the question. I’m more than happy to continue the conversation.
As asked by Nathanial (Region 20) via our Campaign Discord
Thanks Nathanial for your kind words and your support. It genuinely means a great deal to both of us. I also want to say how awesome it is to hear that your STARFLEET journey began as a Junior Member and that your experience was a positive and welcoming one that has kept you coming back - retention is a HUGE part of what this current administration has been trying to work on and push. That’s exactly the kind of story we want to see more of across the Fleet.
To the question at hand: Youth engagement and generational continuity are absolutely on our minds. In many ways, the future of STARFLEET depends on it.
From a recruitment and marketing standpoint, we want to equip chapters with modern, eye-catching, and accessible tools to reach the communities around them - especially at pop culture conventions, school events, and library programs. These tools should reflect the energy of new Trek and help our members communicate just how inclusive and imaginative this organization really is. The work coming out of the Corps of Engineers is indicative of the kind of “look” I’ve been going for - and I’m hoping to open the floodgates on allowing chapters to use them for various projects.
More directly for youth engagement: we’d love to expand resources that chapters and parents can use to create structured, meaningful, and age-appropriate activities for Junior Members. There’s so much potential in that avenue - from mentorship programs, to STEM/space-themed educational modules, to even leadership tracks that help younger members feel like active participants in the organization’s future. Some of these ideas already exist in small regional pockets across STARFLEET - our goal would be to identify those successes and help grow them into something accessible across the board.
We also know that representation and visibility matter, so we’d like to find ways to spotlight the achievements and voices of our younger members more often, whether in the CQ, social media, or even convention panels.
And finally, the answer you’ll probably see us repeat in many places: we’re also open to ideas. One of our campaign goals is Exploring Opportunities - and this is a key area where we want input. We don’t pretend to have all the answers, but we’re excited to work with passionate members to help shape the future. At the risk of sounding like an “old hat” myself - we shouldn’t be seeing the same people running the same programs after decades.
Thank you again for your question and for being a living example of why this work matters.
As asked by Ed (Region 3) via our Campaign Discord
Hey Ed, what a great question!
Being honest - we hadn't thought of this. Richard and I had to meet to talk over the idea and it's such a really good one. One, frankly, that we can begin looking at in our current roles.
These are two (2) channels that we kicked around while discussing it (that I currently follow on my own):
https://www.youtube.com/@TrekCulture
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoLNku_QVrwSWkjdbzZaqUw
I've appeared with the Podcasters with Connor Trinneer (the Shuttlepod Show) once and have really opened up into the space.
That all being said - you have any recommendations? Our ears are wide open to suggestions here.
As asked by Gregg (Region 13) via our Campaign Discord
Thanks for the question, Gregg.
First and foremost, let me be clear - we haven’t won anything yet, and we’re assuming nothing. We still need (and want) to earn the confidence of the membership, and we’re taking that responsibility seriously as we approach the VoC.
That said, of course Richard and I have had conversations about how we’d want to approach filling roles within our administration if we’re given that opportunity. I already know there to be at least one EC vacancy to fill at the end of this administration. From the very beginning, though, we agreed that we want to work with the best STARFLEET has to offer. The best way to do that, as you know all too well, is to have every vacancy advertised and open to applicants.
That’s not just talk. It’s something I’ve already practiced. That’s exactly how I got Richard as my new Chief of Staff and how I was lucky enough to find and appoint Dustin Williams as STARFLEET Historian. Both applied through an open call, and both proved to be exceptional fits. The process works, and I believe it helps surface not just talent, but perspectives and passion we might not otherwise have known about.
Sure, we’ve tossed around a few dream team names (who hasn’t daydreamed about their ideal Trek crew?), but if we speak to anyone directly, it would only be to encourage them to apply - not to hand out roles behind closed doors. I truly, truly mean that - we want to work with people that want to work with us.
One step at a time, for now, though. We’re focused on earning the trust of the membership and are looking forward to the journey ahead.
As asked by Jess (Region 20) via the Region 20 Election channel on their Region 20 Discord
Hey Jess, thanks for the question - and it’s a fair one.
To echo what’s already been said regarding Sol: much of that content is still membership-gated, particularly participation in the live events and Q&As. That said, yes, we’ve occasionally opened up some of it as a recruitment tool and outreach effort, and that’s intentional.
STARFLEET isn’t structured to wall off all its content behind a paywall. Much of what we do, especially community engagement, local events, and online resources, are designed to welcome people into the fold. Membership gives you access to a lot more: the Academy, leadership opportunities, awards programs, the full depth of our internal events, regional structures, special projects, and, yes, members-only content and, namely, the shop perks (special shout-out to David Reffitt).
Richard and I both believe the organization has made real progress in that area, and we’re also looking ahead: we want to continue building meaningful and exciting partnerships and gain access to more resources that make membership more valuable… not just more exclusive.
But the heart of STARFLEET has always been community. You don’t have to “pay to be part of the conversation” but if you want to help shape it, build it, and benefit fully from what it can offer, membership is the gateway.
That’s part of why I’m here and why I joined the USS Haise in the first place.